Every system has a map. Yours lives in eleven people's heads.

Workwise indexes the code, the change requests, the gates and the people who own them into one queryable graph — so an agent can tell you what a change touches before it touches anything.

Across data and departments

One graph spans both

Engineering artefacts connect to the governance and review structures around them, so the graph answers organisational questions, not just structural ones. Colour marks the domain; size marks how much depends on it.

01

What nobody wrote down

Your agents read code fluently and understand your company not at all. Three gaps compound: the architecture that only your longest-tenured engineer holds; the dependencies nobody documented because they were obvious at the time; and the reasoning behind decisions, which left when the person who made them did.

02

Why the existing tools each fall short

Search matches strings, not meaning. Documentation describes the system as it was the day someone wrote it down. Dependency graphs stop at the import — they never reach the change request that authorised the edit, the gate that let it through, or the reviewer accountable for it. Each tool sees one slice.

How it stays true

Generated from the repository, not maintained beside it

The graph cannot quietly drift the way a wiki does. Drift becomes a reading instead of a surprise — every node carries its findings and severity. Across a 1,711-file corpus:

1,350

Healthy

147

Flagged

115

Missing

73

Dead

Start where it costs you most

Six questions the graph already answers

Onboarding an engineer into an unfamiliar service
Scoping the blast radius of a change request
Auditing which gates a release actually cleared
Finding what a deprecated module still feeds
Locating the owner of code nobody claims
Deciding what is safe to delete